|
Legendary Rubric
Ready for
National
Distribution
|
Great Potential for
Learner and Teacher
to Improve Quality
for Learners'
Products/Performance
|
|
Great Potential for
Teachers to be
Consistent in Review
of Learners' Products/
Performances
|
|
Rudiments of Rubric
Framework May or
May Not Help Teacher
or Learner in
Improving Quality
|
|
|
|
 |
Terms are learner/audience friendly |
|
|
 |
Terms are in learner's personal, everyday vocabulary |
|
|
 |
Operational vs. abstract terms |
|
 |
i.e., "a voice all listening ears can hear" vs. "audible" (1st grade) |
 |
i.e., "reads problem, identifies data given, answers question "What am I trying to find out?" vs. "used effective strategy" |
|
|
|
 |
Generated with high level of involvement of learners |
|
|
 |
Learner can verbalize expectations in their own words |
|
|
 |
Teacher friendly, part of educators' vocabulary |
|
 |
i.e., composition scientific method information |
|
|
|
 |
Promotes common interpretations from one teacher to another teacher (inter-rater, reliability) |
|
|
 |
Promotes consistency by reducing the potential of personal bias and increasing reliability of teacher judgment
|
|
|
 |
Learners may not be able to explain criteria and/or performance |
|
|
 |
Terms open to subjectivity and personal judgment |
|
 |
i.e., "Most of the time," "Some of the time," "Rarely" |
|
|
|
 |
Feedback will be inconsistent between teachers |
|
|
 |
Will allow sorting for grading purposes, but knowing grade alone may not encourage learner or teacher to work to improve product /performance |
|
| Visual Appeal |
 |
Creates a "map" that the learner will at least make an attempt to achieve |
|
|
 |
Creates a framework to report both student growth and progress |
|
|
 |
Uses brain's attraction for patterns/visuals to engage learner |
|
 |
lines |
 |
white space |
 |
graphics |
 |
spacing |
 |
fonts |
 |
bolding |
 |
shading |
 |
underlining |
|
|
|
 |
Placement of elements signifies their importance, helps learner see "BIG" picture |
|
|
 |
Progression of stages of competency are easy to chart, both growth and progress |
|
|
 |
Accommodates both visual and linguistic learning styles |
|
|
 |
Uses only printed word, accommodates linguistic learning style |
|
|
 |
Teacher is necessary to act as guide to learner; must explain, assist, translate |
|
|
 |
Serves as a starting point for explaining expectations |
|
|
 |
Makes clear for teacher the elements and differentiation between quality of student performance/products |
|
|
 |
Uses printed word exclusively |
|
|
 |
Elements and stages of competency may be present but time consuming to identify |
|
|
| Note: Holistic rubrics fit into this column (holistic scoring is considering and synthesizing teacher judgment into one overall score) |
|
| Student's Role |
 |
Defines an active role for learner to increase motivation |
|
|
 |
Evidence tool is used to allow student to plan, assess, set and monitor personal goals |
|
 |
student "comments" space |
 |
"Legend in Your Own Time" column |
 |
"what's your evidence" requirement |
 |
convince a peer, (initial off) |
 |
"If I had to "rate" your work today it would be ___, but I don't, so what's your plan?" |
|
|
|
 |
Evidence tool is used to promote periodic, systematic and timely dialogue between learner and teacher |
|
 |
dated notions |
 |
color coding |
 |
dual titled |
 |
"skinny columns"
(columns to show in between stages of competency) |
|
|
|
 |
Learner takes passive role and remains reliant on teacher to identify strengths, areas in need of improvement and goals |
|
|
 |
Uses numbers and % that under challenge some learners while overwhelming others |
|
|
 |
Runs the risk that focus becomes quantity rather then quality |
|
|
 |
Creates advisories of teacher and learner, teacher as an "official" rather than a "coach" |
|
| The "Fix" Correctives |
 |
Facilitates the dialogue beyond what's wrong, what's right to how to improve the product/
performance |
|
|
 |
Descriptors provide learner with action verb that helps direct a quality product/performance |
|
|
 |
Provides formative feedback to learners while they are in process of developing products/performances |
|
 |
i.e., "need title page" vs. "no title page" (4th grade research project) |
 |
i.e., "uses quote, metaphor, analogy in introduction to create interest" vs. "clear focus" |
|
|
|
 |
Student understand that work is not complete, but must rely on teacher to supply corrective |
|
 |
i.e., "lack of knowledge of topic"
"unorganized confusing content"
"little or no voice evident" |
|
|
|
 |
Most useful to teacher in making informed decision about what needs more instruction, more teaching |
|
|
 |
"Fix" correctives are not a consideration; purpose is to be able to categorize work into quality summative levels for reporting, useful for end of the year evaluation to multiple stakeholders |
|
| The "Why" Purpose |
 |
Explains the benefits for student development strong competency |
|
|
 |
Relates in learner language what results may be possible if "mastery" is achieved |
|
 |
i.e., "INTRODUCTION grabs reader's attentions so they will continue to read" |
 |
i.e., "MECHANICS (reader's reading is obstacle free)" |
|
|
|
 |
Honor students' motivational need to understand purpose |
|
|
 |
Can appear on rubric in the task description, within the elements' boxes and/or within the stags of competency descriptors |
|
|
 |
Assumes teacher knows benefits and student accepts on faith that results of their efforts will be useful to them |
|
 |
Teacher says, "Trust me, this is a skill that you will need someday." |
 |
Learners may be constantly asking "Why are we doing this?" "When will I need it?" "Do we have to?" "Will it be graded?" |
|
|
|
 |
No mention of purpose/benefits |
|
|
 |
Relies on each user to justify purpose/benefit to learner |
|
|
 |
Data collected from rating learners' products/performances can be used to judge whether goals have been achieved |
|